In the process of privatization were unlawfully implicated Ministry of Trade and Industry because the statutes of these companies confirmed that these enterprises are established and registered with the statute which is dated 03/12/2010 / . When the date of establishment of these new enterprises compare with dates : 07/09/2010 / as the date of the announcement of a 45- round Privatization date 20/10/2010 / as the date of qualification, he date 20/10 / 2010 / as the date of bid opening and announcement of the winners of privatization , then we conclude that the enterprise is established and registered in the Ministry of Trade and Industry dated 03/12/2010 / . Of these , unequivocally proved that the aforementioned officials KPA before the aforementioned enterprises privatized after several months have registered at the Ministry of Trade and Industry as a new enterprise management KPA . When we consider that the legal entity established by recording it as a date of registration of the Company 's new Shock Absorbers Factory Sh.PK and NewCo Shock Absorbers - Administration Building : Limited Liability Company is the date 03.12.2010 , since this recorded on these enterprises . From this indubitably proved that the responsible officials PAK - round 45 A privatized Privatisation of two fictitious companies which , under applicable law , have been registered and as such have been nonexistent as legal entities . ( Proof : see statutes enterprises dated 03.12.2010 ) . Kosovo Privatization Agency had announced the sale of the New Shock Absorbers Factory Limited Liability Company (LLC ) on sale by the method of spin-off special . In Appendix E of the document ( Exhibit no. 4 ) stated that the Winning Bidder or prospective purchaser of NewCo Shock Absorbers Factory Sh.PK is obliged to continue to maintain current business activity in the coming years . While in Annex F ( Probation no. 4 ) Monitoring the fulfillment of contractual obligations say that Purchaser is obliged to report in writing to DNA or its legal successor to continuing and maintaining the same business activity , each 6 months to 5 years following the date of signing of the sales contract . Privatization winner had not kept the company activities for a single day , while the KPA had not monitored the performance of the contract and there was never a check . Why ? Unlawful The Privatization process turns out to be including the Ministry of Internal Affairs because , according to statements KPA spokesman , MIA was issued a certificate that the winners of privatization are not under investigation , on the contrary these remain in violation of DNA burden because the latter had a legal obligation to verify the background of the winners of privatization and has not done , and thus tried to bear the burden of responsibility MIA ( remains of verified ) .